Evaluating Evidence Discussion Paper
Running Head: EVALUATING EVIDENCE 1 Evaluating Evidence Name Institution EVALUATING EVIDENCE 2 Evaluating Evidence In any clinical setting, there are several well-established methods of finding and evaluating evidence. Different methods for evaluating evidence can present higher-level evidence depending on the different type of clinical questions that need answering. Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses are the two most common methods for evaluating evidence Evaluating Evidence Discussion Paper.
ORDER YOUR PAPER HERE
They are considered the highest quality of evidence for clinical decision making. Systematic review and meta-analysis are positioned at the highest section of the evidence pyramid. Since these study designs reduce bias and provide more reliable findings (Rolfe, 2015). A systematic review is a comprehensive literature review mainly focused on particular questions, and systematic review tries to address specific clinical issues. In the systematic review, the researcher uses an organized method that focuses on locating, assembling and evaluation of literature using specific criteria. On the other hand, Meta-analyses uses statistical methods to combine data from various research studies. Evaluating Evidence Discussion Paper